JIHAD: THE WAR AGAINST YOU (KAFIR)

JIHAD: THE WAR AGAINST YOU (KAFIR)
-By Malhar Unmesh Narvekar

• Chapter 1: Who is a Kafir?
  
  
  In Islam, a Kafir is anyone who rejects the Oneness of God, denies His prophets, His revelations, and the certainty of Day of Judgment. Idolaters, polytheists, and those who turn away from “Divine Truth” are all Kafirs.

  
  

  The Quran speaks without ambiguity about the fate of a Kafir:

  
  

  Surah Al-Imran Ayat 4 (3:4 Quran):

  “Then those who reject Faith in the Signs of Allah will suffer the severest penalty..”

  
  

  Surah Fussilat Ayat 50 (41:50 Quran):

  “..,But We will show the Unbelievers the truth of all that they did, and We shall give them the taste of a severe Penalty.”

  
  

  Surah Al-Fath Ayat 29 (48:29 Quran):

  “Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves..”

  
  

  The words have been spoken. The decree has been written.

   If you are not with them, you are against them.

   You are the Kafir — the marked one, the enemy in the final war.

   You are the Kafir — the declared target in a war you did not choose.

   And Jihad is the storm that has already been unleashed against you.
  
  
• Chapter 2: Jihad.
  
  

  On April 22, 2025, in the supposedly "safe" valleys of Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, a nightmare unfolded. It has brutally proven again, the fact that the ideology of jihad is very well alive and fully operational.

  
  

  The victims were Hindus, and the terrorists made sure to separate them from the rest. They forced them to strip, inspecting for signs of circumcision, they ordered them to recite the Kalma and they demanded identification to confirm religious identity. It was not random violence. It was a systematic, deliberate HINDU MASSACRE. It was jihad, plain and simple.

  
  

  The terror outfit responsible, The Resistance Front (TRF), is nothing but a rebranded face of Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Pakistan-based jihadist organization that has waged war against India for decades. The methods used in Pahalgam were not new; they were textbook jihad — identify the Kafir, isolate the Kafir, and eliminate the Kafir.
  
  

  Before the mourning could even begin, the apologists started whitewashing the crime: “But even a Muslim was killed, therefore terrorism has no religion.”

  
  

  Sayed Adil Hussain Shah, the Muslim who died, was not murdered because of his faith. He was executed because he helped the tourists escape. In the eyes of the terrorists, he committed an unforgivable sin — helping the kafirs. Under the doctrine of Takfiri Jihad, any Muslim who aids kafirs is no longer a true Muslim. He becomes an apostate, a traitor, an impure. Adil Hussain Shah was punished for his humanity, not for his faith.

  
  

  This was a Hindu massacre. Nothing more, nothing less. The terrorists did not ask about caste, language or region.. They looked for Hindus and they killed Hindus.

  
  

  The claim that Kashmir was "safe" for tourists now lies in ruins. While I fully appreciate the actions taken by the government in controlling the situation post-Article 370 abrogation, it is impossible to accept that Kashmir was truly secure. How could a major tourist hotspot like Baisaran have no active police patrolling? No army presence? No security whatsoever? The question must be answered!
  
  

  The Pahalgam massacre was not born out of thin air. It is the natural result of decades of hatred, indoctrination, and jihadist philosophy being pumped into Kashmiri society.

  
  

  The much-eulogised separatist leader, Syed Ali Shah Geelani, made it clear in his book Nava-e-Hurriyat: 

  (a)"India is a greater enemy of Islam than Israel."

  (b)"Muslims are a nation wholly separate from Hindus."

  (c)"Muslims are united not by homeland, race, or language, but solely by Islam."

  (d)"Pakistan was created for the supremacy of Islam."

  (e)"Kashmir must become an Islamic state. Our goal is to establish an Islamic government."

  
  

  There is no ambiguity here. The hatred is explicit. The goal is clear.

  
  

  And if there were any doubts left about the mindset that still festers in the Valley, the 2024 Lok Sabha elections exposed it. The much-eulogised separatist, Engineer Rashid, won from the Baramulla constituency with a staggering 472,481 votes.
  
  

  Just days before the massacre at Pahalgam, Pakistan’s Army Chief General Asim Munir proudly declared:

  "Our forefathers thought we are different from Hindus in every possible aspect of life. Our religions are different, our customs are different, our traditions are different, our thoughts are different, our ambitions are different. That was the foundation of the two-nation theory. We are two nations; we are not one nation.", "Kashmir is the jugular vein of Pakistan."

  
  

  This is the ideological engine that drives jihad, the belief that Hindus and Muslims are eternally separate, eternally opposed, and that violence against Hindus is justified, even sacred.

  
  

  The Pahalgam attack is the inevitable outcome of the separatist, jihadist doctrine that has been allowed to fester for decades.

  
  

  Hindus must wake up to this reality. Its time to be united and remember बटेंगे तो कटेंगे.
  
  

  We must remember: 

  धर्म एव हतो हन्ति धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः।

  तस्माद् धर्मो न हन्तव्यो मा नो धर्मो हतोऽवधीत्॥

  
  

  We are the land of Buddha. But we are also the land of Krishna and Arjuna.

  
  

  No doubt, Bharat is preparing to deliver a befitting response to this massacre. The suspension of the Indus Water Treaty, the expulsion orders, are just the opening moves. As rightly said by former J&K DGP Vaid — the final reply must be so that Asim Munir should shit in his pants.

Desecration of The Temple of Democracy

(Prime Minister Modi in the 18th Lok Sabha)

Desecration of The Temple of Democracy  

-By Malhar Unmesh Narvekar

The so-called respecters of democracy have today, made a mockery of the very institution they claim to uphold. During the Prime Minister's speech, the opposition displayed a shocking lack of decorum and respect, incessantly disrupting and undermining the dignity of both the Parliament and the Speaker's chair. Their unrelenting sloganeering from the beginning to the end of the Prime Minister's address was a blatant affront to democratic norms. 

In stark contrast, during the Leader of Opposition's (LoP) speech yesterday, members of the ruling coalition maintained a respectful silence, honouring the solemnity of parliamentary proceedings. Yet today, the opposition not only disrespected the Prime Minister personally but also the sanctity of his office by shouting, "Pradhan Mantri tum shant raho, shant raho, shant raho!" 

Is this how we honour the position and the elder statesman who holds it?

Since the inauguration of the 18th Lok Sabha, the opposition has consistently behaved in a boisterous and disruptive manner. Even during the oath-taking ceremony, leaders like Owaisi tarnished the significance of the event with statements like "Jai Palestine." Maybe they did not have the guts or, more appropriately, the will to say "Jai Hind," "Bharat Mata Ki Jai," or "Vande Mataram!"


The LoP, in his speech yesterday complained that when he and the Prime Minister shook hands with the Speaker, the Speaker stood straight for him but bowed for the Prime Minister. The LoP forgets that in our Bharatiya sanskriti, it is customary to bow to elders as a sign of respect. And incidentally Respect is earned, not demanded.

If the opposition continues to act in such a flagrant and boisterous manner, they are digging their own political graves. I urge the ruling coalition to take this matter seriously.

As Sanjay Dixit states in Krishna Gopeshvara, "A rashtra is destroyed more by the silence of its good persons, who are in the majority, than the injustices wrought by the evil deeds of an oppressive minority." This is also a call to all Hindus to raise their voices and condemn the LoP's remark, "Hindu hinsak hai." Even if they claim this statement was directed at the ruling coalition members, labelling them as fake Hindus, would such statements be tolerated if directed at the so-called minorities?

After today's parliamentary proceedings, my respect for the Prime Minister has only grown. With patience and poise, he continued his speech, delivering a resounding rebuttal to the opposition's disruptive antics. He truly embodied the spirit of "Ek akela, sab par bhaari!"

In conclusion, I quote the words of Shri Sitaram Goelji, "The leftists swear by democracy only so long as they are in the opposition."

Review Of Western Media Narratives on India: From Gandhi To Modi

Review Of

Western Media Narratives on India: From Gandhi To Modi

Umesh Upadhyay's insightful discourse, "Western Media Narratives on India: From Gandhi to Modi," masterfully dismantles the veils of bias shrouding Western media representations of Bharat. With meticulous research and incisive analysis, Upadhyay unveils the agenda-driven reporting that has long plagued international media outlets in their portrayal of Bharat. 

Through a compelling narrative rich with facts, probing inquiries, and discerning observations, Upadhyay compellingly challenges the credibility of Western media agencies. In doing so, he offers a cogent argument, inviting the nation to reclaim its narrative and authentically articulate its own story on the global stage.

                                                                               -Malhar Narvekar

 

Review of Varna, Jati, Caste: A Primer on Indian Social Structures

Review of

Varna, Jati, Caste: A Primer on Indian Social Structures 

Varna, Jati, Caste written by Rajiv Malhotra and co-authored by Vijaya Viswanathan is a crisp and effective rebuttal to the scathing criticisms and withering attacks related to the caste system on Bharat.

This penetrating and insightful analysis effectively dismantles the entrenched myths surrounding caste. And guides the reader on a revelatory exploration of the Varna-Jati system unveiling its authentic character, rich diversity and profound complexity.

                                                                               -Malhar Narvekar